Type: Public Statement
Proposed by: Jessica Rey
History: reached consensus at GA on Sunday 11/27/2011
AMENDED VERSION
Emergency Communiqué Establishing our Right to Occupy, Statement
Submitted to the OccupyLA General Assembly Sunday November 27th, 2011 drafted by Alex & Jessica
What:
An appeal to all those across the world engaged in the struggle for social justice, to stand for the right of the people to assemble and exercise free speech.
To be released immediately, or upon forceful displacement of Solidarity Park.
How (Statement):
We recognize, and urge city officials to recognize, the entrenched interests pressuring for the evacuation of Solidarity Park on behalf of “local” but most certainly multinational corporations and banks, such as the Central City Association preparing to lobby for an anti-encampment ordinance. We assert, in light of our action on Nov. 17th, in which a private citizen on behalf of Bank of America placed 46 protesters under private persons arrest with the help of hundreds of the LAPD as well as a militarized 4-block radius, that the city is not being forthright in its reasoning for eviction and is in fact moving at the behest of the 1%.
OLA rejects municipal health, safety or aesthetic concerns as inadequate reasoning to displace our occupation, a political space for unhindered peaceful assembly.
We remind you that while you speak of the sustainability of our occupation, we speak of the sustainability of corruption and greed in our socio-economic systems, including government. We do not consider ‘the grass’ – unsustainable in this climate without huge cost to the taxpayer – to be a suitable reason to displace an encampment of people intent on exercising their right to free speech. The “problems with OLA” exploited in the media (crime, drug and alcohol abuse, theft, etc) are not isolated to our encampment, but rather exist as a microcosm of the ills of in society at large due to widespread lack of resources/poverty.
The challenges within Occupy LA are the same that exist right down the street in any direction, but we have thrust it from the periphery, right onto the doorstep of City Hall. We stand behind our de-gentrification of the downtown space as a direct response to the relationship between government and private corporations and the assault on public space.
We remind you that, as taxpayers: we pay for our streets, we pay the salaries for those making decisions on our right to assemble. All that we ask for in return is the representation of our interests. This social contract has been broken and, rather than wait for utter economic collapse, the people have used occupation both symbolically, and as a means to amplify our voice. Our presence as OccupyLA, in its current form, actively asserts our right to redress of grievances, as accorded to us in the 1st Amendment. We occupy as a presence and force of vigilance, outside of a political process that leaves no room for the organic and legitimate voice of the people.
When faced with the unjust relationship of government officials with the private sphere and the corrupting influence of money in the political process, it is important to measure the reaction of law enforcement against the message put out by the people in the streets. The organized violence that has characterized police response to OWS and other cities across the US involved in this movement against economic inequality obviously is proportionate to the strength of our message. It is important to highlight the concerted efforts of 19 cities, under the umbrella of the Dept. of Homeland Security, to suppress the occupation movement in one fell swoop.
We call upon all sisters and brothers of the occupy movement — sympathizers, supporters and critics — to join us as we speak out against the use of intimidation, force, and political power to break up peaceful occupations and repress or criminalize the exercise of our first amendment rights.
Why:
To have a statement to release at the time of the raid to the press, the world, and other occupations. So we make clear their misuse of power to repress our movement.
—————————————————————————–
Emergency Communique Establishing our Right to Occupy
What:
A public statement, call and communique by OccupyLA for activists, everyday individuals, occupiers, and all those across the world engaged in the struggle for social justice, to stand for the right of the people to assemble and exercise free speech.
To be released immediately upon forcible removal of occupiers from Solidarity Park.
How (Statement):
We recognize, and urge city officials to recognize, the entrenched interests pressuring for the evacuation of Solidarity Park on behalf of “local” but most certainly multinational corporations, just as they have collectively lobbied as the Central City Association, pushing for an anti-encampment ordinance. We assert, in light of our action on Nov. 17th in which a private citizen on behalf of BofA placed 46 protesters under private persons arrest with the help of hundreds of the LAPD as well as a militarized 4-block radius, that the city is not being transparent in their reasoning for eviction and is in fact moving at the behest of the 1%.
OLA rejects municipal health, safety or aesthetic concerns as invalid reasoning to displace our encampment, a political space for unhindered peaceful assembly and the expression of free speech.
We remind you that as taxpayers, for decades we have paid into paving these streets and funding the operations of governmental buildings without asking for anything other than representation of our interests. This social contract has been broken, and rather than wait for utter economic collapse, the people have taken encampment upon themselves as a tool of sustaining and amplifying free speech. Our presence as OccupyLA, in its current form, actively asserts our right to free assembly through the chosen method of occupation. We occupy as a presence and force of vigilance under a political process that leaves no room for the organic and legitimate voice of the people.
We remind you that though you speak of the sustainability of our encampment, we are here to address the sustainability of corruption and greed in our social, economic and governmental processes. We do not consider the grass, unsustainable in this climate, to be a suitable reason to displace an encampment of people intent on exercising their right to free speech. The issues affecting our encampment and exploited in the media, in terms of non-participation via drug or alcohol use, or the appearance of increased petty crime in and around the immediate encampment area, are a result of the same lack of resources/poverty that disproportionately effects many of our communities on a consistent and predatory basis. We reject the criminalization of these behaviors and instead demand their prompt consideration as symptoms of a diseased public policy process insufficient in addressing the needs of the people.
The Occupation of Los Angeles, in assembling peacefully at Solidarity Park, has created a microcosm of the society we live in and unabashedly thrusts it from the periphery right onto the doorstep of City Hall. We stand behind our de-gentrification of the downtown space as a direct response to the relationship between government and private corporations and the assault on public space.
When faced with the unjust relationship of government officials with the private sphere and the corrupting influence of money in the political process, it is important to measure the reaction of law enforcement against the message put out by the people in the streets. It is important to point out the comparatively harsh and organized violence that has characterized the police response to OWS in cities across the US and how our message about economic inequality has something to do with that. It is important to highlight the concerted efforts of 19 cities, under the umbrella of the Dept. of Homeland Security, to propogandize and suppress the occupation movement in one fell swoop.
Going further, we call upon all sisters and brothers of the occupy movement, sympathizers, supporters and critics to join us as we defend and reestablish our individual and collective rights to free speech and assembly (date and time of determined meeting point at that time). And we call upon all individuals to speak out against the use of intimidation, force, politics and power to break up peaceful occupations and repress or criminalize the exercise of our first amendment rights.
Why:
So we have a statement to release at the time of the raid to the press, the world, and other occupations. To make clear their misuse of power to repress our movement.
A fellow member of the LoveTribe and I were speaking to LAPD officers around 3 p.m. on the day before the eviction. As we went around, we asked if there was going to be a raid, many didn’t know. Actually no one actually knew. The ONLY people who knew but kept it secret were: Mayor Villaraigosa, Chief Beck, Deputy Chief Jacobs and Commander Smith. Everyone were kept in the dark and were expecting the eviction.
Many of the officers we met though were surprised by the material my fellow LoveTribe member were passing out. And that was
California Civil Code Section 52.1
http://bit.ly/tepGyx
Especially the part that reads:
(a) If a person or persons, whether or not acting under color of law, interferes by threats, intimidation, or coercion, or attempts to interfere by threats, intimidation, or coercion, with the
exercise or enjoyment by any individual or individuals of rights secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or of the rights secured by the Constitution or laws of this state…may also seek a civil penalty of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000)…
I believe more so the command staff felt the pressure as OWSLA are supportive of the LAPD Officers and were screaming YOU DESERVE A RAISE and officers were passing the fliers we had to their supervisors, which lead upstairs to the command staff. Not know what to do, and having Occupiers chanting YOU DESERVE A RAISE helped create an environment of apprehension that management could not grasp.
What also helped was the injunction that was submitted online to the federal court asking for a restraining order to end Villaraigosa’s attempt to shut us down. Yet they played stoned-face and brought in from what I am hearing more than 2,000 officer from the different bureau (Central, Valley, West and South) to back Central Division in a City-Wide Tactical Alert, when it truly was not necessary, had they not put up a ridiculous timeline to frighten off Occupiers, which ultimately led to more than 1,000 new Occupiers and supporters.
Yet looking back today at the Occupation, LAPD is back to normal. No more City Tac-Alert and it is business as usual. Still one has to wonder, how much money was spent holding over officers from Days to Morning Watch? In a Tac-Alert, the captain would hold over officers and assign them to a special event. I heard officers coming from the Valley and Wilshire Division coming end. Don’t know if it were true, but the specialized Detail Metro Division (Mounted, K9, SWAT) were present on horseback.
How much did all this cost us? Who authorized the overtime and equipment for four arrests, when nothing would have happened if neither the Mayor nor the LAPD Command staff have the press conference and say that there is a 72 hour deadline? And according to the folks at Kid’s Village, there was not enough time to remove everything they wanted…which was not necessary because according to Smith, they had no plan to evict…WHAT?
Therefore, members from LoveTribe who left, will be back and will plan to sue the LAPD Command Staff, the Mayor’s Office using California Civil Right 52.1. Because, free speech and assembly does NOT have a time limit.
Good job by OLA filing the injunction and posting the civil code section. That was a dirty trick on the part of the mayor with the after business day Friday press release easily avoiding any ability to vote, discuss, protest, appeal or otherwise exercise public opinion.
It would appear to me that since the city council has already approved the movements right to stay, there is an abuse of power situation being exercised by the mayor. No checks and balances, no vote, no chance for public comment.
Clearly there are some supporter on city council for the movement including Mr. Alarcon whom I commend for his support of the responsible banking measure and hope that many of the protestors continue to come to city hall and voice their opinion.
The occupation is a great opportunity for government officials to make meaningful change to a broken system by brining the problems of jobs and homelessness to their front door step.
Online Article……
[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]……